Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

50%
+0 −0
Q&A What would this nebula look like from a planet?

I have a binary system. The primary star is F- or G-class; the secondary is K-class, 20AU away, and in a small reflection nebula (suggested here). A planet orbits the primary in the habitable zon...

3 answers  ·  posted 9y ago by Monica Cellio‭  ·  edited 4y ago by Monica Cellio‭

Question stars nebula light
#1: Post edited by user avatar Monica Cellio‭ · 2020-06-17T01:19:42Z (over 4 years ago)
localized links
  • <p>I have a binary system. The primary star is F- or G-class; the secondary is K-class, 20AU away, and in a small reflection nebula (suggested <a href="https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/a/25204/28">here</a>). A planet orbits the primary in the habitable zone. <a href="http://www.solstation.com/habitable.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">This article</a> suggests that F, G, and K classes can all support habitable planets; it's talking about unary stars, but @HDE226868 <a href="http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/27234066#27234066">suggested in chat</a> that this range works for binary stars too.</p>
  • <p>The reason for the reflection nebula is to make the secondary star bright enough to illuminate the planet when it's in range. During <a href="https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/a/25397/28">some times of year</a> the planet will experience continuous light, but the light from the two stars is <em>different</em>. The primary produces the yellowish light that we're familiar with from our own sun, and the secondary produces...what?</p>
  • <p>Without the nebula, a K-class star would produce <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_classification#Harvard_spectral_classification" rel="nofollow noreferrer">pale yellow or orange light</a>. The gas in a nebula scatters the light from nearby stars in different ways, which can change its color. For example, Messier 78 looks like this in space:</p>
  • <p><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/AFOZr.jpg" height="600"/></p>
  • <p>I've been told that reflection nebulas are <a href="http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/reflection_nebulae.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">biased toward being blue</a>, though I don't know how that's affected by star type.</p>
  • <p>How do I figure out what my star in a nebula looks like from my planet, particularly the color of its light, taking into account:</p>
  • <ul>
  • <li>K-class star </li>
  • <li>in a reflection nebula </li>
  • <li>viewed from the surface of a habitable planet?</li>
  • </ul>
  • <p>I have a binary system. The primary star is F- or G-class; the secondary is K-class, 20AU away, and in a small reflection nebula (suggested <a href="https://scientific-speculation.codidact.com/questions/213937#answer-213938">here</a>). A planet orbits the primary in the habitable zone. <a href="http://www.solstation.com/habitable.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">This article</a> suggests that F, G, and K classes can all support habitable planets; it's talking about unary stars, but @HDE226868 <a href="http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/27234066#27234066">suggested in chat</a> that this range works for binary stars too.</p>
  • <p>The reason for the reflection nebula is to make the secondary star bright enough to illuminate the planet when it's in range. During <a href="https://scientific-speculation.codidact.com/questions/213979#answer-213990">some times of year</a> the planet will experience continuous light, but the light from the two stars is <em>different</em>. The primary produces the yellowish light that we're familiar with from our own sun, and the secondary produces...what?</p>
  • <p>Without the nebula, a K-class star would produce <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_classification#Harvard_spectral_classification" rel="nofollow noreferrer">pale yellow or orange light</a>. The gas in a nebula scatters the light from nearby stars in different ways, which can change its color. For example, Messier 78 looks like this in space:</p>
  • <p><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/AFOZr.jpg" height="600"/></p>
  • <p>I've been told that reflection nebulas are <a href="http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/reflection_nebulae.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">biased toward being blue</a>, though I don't know how that's affected by star type.</p>
  • <p>How do I figure out what my star in a nebula looks like from my planet, particularly the color of its light, taking into account:</p>
  • <ul>
  • <li>K-class star </li>
  • <li>in a reflection nebula </li>
  • <li>viewed from the surface of a habitable planet?</li>
  • </ul>