Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Can a star be so distant/isolated that its 'Earth' can't see other stars?

+0
−0

I'm putting together a scenario, where a "Sun" and some debris are flung so distant that 14 billion years after the big bang, it has an "Earth" (and maybe some other minor rocky/icy objects), but no stars are observable to the naked eye.

I know we can't see anything other than our own galaxy with the naked eye, but this would be a galaxy-less "rogue" star. Is this possible - if so, how?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/34553. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

It's totally possible (sort of)!

Such stars are called - not surprisingly - intergalactic stars. These stars are often referred to as hypervelocity stars, because in order to reach galactic escape velocity, they have to be traveling really quickly.

The current theory is that a pair of binary stars encounters the supermassive black hole at the center of their galaxy. One star goes towards the central black hole, while the other is flung out of the galaxy at an enormous speed.


Image in the public domain.

This graphic details a three-star system encountering the supermassive black hole, but the same setup works just as well with only two stars. Only one will be ejected, not two.

That said, galaxies would still most likely be visible from a planet orbiting the star. Many galaxies can be seen with the naked eye, and this would still be the case for planets outside the galaxy. So it's likely that inhabitants of this planet (if there are any) would still see plenty of galaxies. They'd just be very, very faint, for the most part.

Additionally, we have to deal with the issue of the orbital stability of the material orbiting the planet. Any encounter strong enough to fling the star out of the galaxy might dislodge the debris from its orbit around the star, sending it somewhere completely different. I would think it unlikely for the star to pick up a substantial amount of planet-forming material on its way out, and certainly not outside the galaxy in the intergalactic medium, but its possible.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »