Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Could a universe with something like special relativity based on position instead of velocity be logically consistent?

+0
−0

In a parallel universe if two objects occupy different positions in space then in the reference frame of each object the other has length contraction and time dilation. If the two objects are very close to each other then the amount of length contraction and time dilation is negligible but if two objects are very far apart then the length contraction and time dilation becomes significant. The amount of length contraction and time dilation that two objects have relative to each other depends on how far apart they are from each other.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/30909. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

Both time dilation and length contraction depend on something called the Lorentz factor, commonly denoted by $\gamma$. It is defined in terms of the velocity, $v$, and speed of light, $c$, as $$\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}$$ Some like to simplify this a bit by writing $\beta=v/c$, and substituting accordingly.

However, if we were to substitute in $x$ for $v$, we have some issues:

  • Units. $x$ has units of distance, while $c$ has units of speed. I suppose you can throw in a constant there, but that seems a bit ad hoc. Speaking of which, that brings us to a different problem.
  • The derivation. A rather elegant derivation is given in this answer, as well as some applications to energy and momentum. Basically, if we start with the assumption that the line element $ds^2$ is given by $$ds^2=c^2dt^2-dx^2-dy^2-dx^2$$ then we can find $\gamma$ with only a small bit of work, including introducing a quantity called $d\tau$, the proper time. The expression for the line element, by the way, assumes we use the $(+,-,-,-)$ metric signature.

    The thing is, this equation - the Minkowski metric - is the cornerstone of Minkowski spacetime, the foundation for special relativity. In order to change this so that you get your desired result, then you have to create an entirely new structure for this "flat" spacetime.

    An excellent geometric derivation of the Lorentz factor is given in Elements of Astrophysics (beware - large file!), on page 20.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »