Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

A Domineering Intelligent Species

+0
−0

In my story I want to have a sub-class of humans who are very domineering and greedy. They are obviously pro-slavery, and believe in survival of the strongest.

I'm wondering how this mindset would conflict with intelligence. I can't see these kind of humans sitting down and reading, nor engaging in activities that are intellectually stimulating. I think friendships would be sparse and not very strong bonds due to lack of trust and lack of desire to share anything. I also feel intelligent people tend to be more empathetic and less likely to be domineering.

So my question is, how do these serious, angry, domineering humans have fun? Would they instead be more animalistic and actually lack intelligence? If they don't have fun but are also intellgent what is their motivation to be greedy and gain more? Basically how do you reconcile brutal greed with high intelligence?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/25224. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »