Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Hitting the tipping point for core removal to degrade atmosphere retention on a moon

+0
−0

Let us assume that we have a moon with a reasonable iron core enough that it can retain atmosphere, (as per this question), now let us further assume that the people who settle on the moon are short sighted and start mining deep into the moon while also building up a breathable atmosphere. The ores are then processed and shipped off-moon to the planet.

At some point the moon is going to hit an environmental disaster wherein the mass is reduced such that atmosphere starts to leak.

  1. How quickly would this become noticeable (assuming no one is really looking for it). Would it be gradual or sudden?

  2. Would the planet capture all or most of the lost gasses?

  3. What other effects are they likely to see? Would the orbit change, for example?

  4. How much material would need to have been removed for such a "disaster" to start?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/21274. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »