Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

A world with 1/3rd gravity but 1/2 atmospheric pressure. Would it be easier to fly?

+0
−0

Let's say on an alien planet called Thindor, the surface gravity is 3.27 m/s2 (which is 1/3rd of Earth's). But the atmospheric pressure is only 50 kPa (which is 1/2 of Earth's). Assume the same 20/80 ratio of oxygen/nitrogen in the atmosphere, and the same air temperature.

The question is, Is it easier to achieve powered aircraft flight in this world?

My instincts say yes, because gravity is one of those exponential things (and pressure seems to be more linear in the equations I've seen). HOWEVER, aircraft engines need to breathe oxygen from the atmosphere (and there is only half the oxygen flow available), plus air cooling would be reduced too. And besides, propellers and jet engine compressors basically take the existing air and push it backwards, so I'm thinking thrust might be reduced by 1/2 as well.

So is it easier or harder to fly with conventional aircraft?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/18665. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »