Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Size of the volcano that ends the world

+0
−0

One of the theories behind the extinction of the dinosaurs is the eruption of one or a series of volcanoes. Supposedly the ash expelled by these eruptions blocked out the sun, killing plants and thus disrupting the entire food chain. A more recent example of the power of volcanoes on the environment would be the Little Ice Age, where the whole world felt colder for a while because of a volcano.

What I'm wondering, though, is if, some time in the near future, there was a volcano that ended most if not all life on this planet (humans can survive, but only because they're so smart), how big would this volcano have to be, and what would the eruption be like? Is there perhaps a place where a volcano would have an easier time of it? Is there maybe a volcano out there that fulfills all these criteria?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/18037. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

It all depends on how obliterated you want the Earth to be.

If you want nothing left, you need to completely destroy Earth and accelerate all the remaining fragments so that they clear the area pretty quickly. Using some base numbers from this answer:

The gravitational binding energy of Earth, $E_{GB} = 2.4 \times 10^{32} \text{J} $.

The energy released by a VEI 5 event is 24 megatons. 1 megaton = 4.184PJ = $ 4.184 \times 10^{15} \text{J}$. Going on the exponential VEI scale of "ten times more destructive", we can estimate (this is not exact) the energy of a VEI 18 (as ShemSeger suggests) to be $ 4.184 \times 10^{28} \text{J} $. I shall call this number $E_{V18}$.

Let's see: if $E_{V18} = E_{GB} $, the explosion merely destroys the Earth and separates the fragments enough that they don't rebind gravitationally. If however $ E_{V18} \gg E_{GB} $, the planet explodes and is never seen again.

In this case, $E_{V18} \ll E_{GB} $ - so we need more energy. Approximately a VEI 22 event has enough energy to simply gravitationally unbind the planet; to completely splinter it off into space you want more.

Note that this is theoretical: firstly, it relies on perfect energy efficiency and distribution, which are not going to happen; and secondly, the Earth doesn't hold enough energy in total to cause an eruption this size.

(Looking at some collateral effects of that, fragments of this explosion are going to go shooting off at something like 12,000 metres per second... don't put anything in the way.)

Using the scale of 10 times more or less destructive as you move up or down the VEI scale, you can also work out roughly what level of destruction you'll get for a given VEI event. For comparison, a VEI 10 is pretty much guaranteed to cause mass extinction of almost everything.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »