Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

How far in the future would a modern human need to go before they were functionally a different species than people of the time?

+0
−0

A staple of fantasy involving time travel is the hero (or heroine) zipping off into the future and then meeting a future lover with whom they go on to have wacky time-based adventures before presumably settling down to make some babies.

Eventually, though, this won't work. Even if one of the future people falls in love with our time traveler, they won't be genetically compatible because humans will have evolved to much in the interim. How far into the future would someone need to travel before running into a species barrier between themselves and the locals? I'm assuming that there haven't been any major evolutionary bottlenecks due to some sort of apocalypse, and that people haven't utilized technology to artificially speciate themselves or stabilize their genome and actively prevent it.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/14962. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »