Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Can a planet with 2/3 Orbital eccentricity sustain life?

+0
−0

On a planet where it is Earth-like, the orbit around the sun is a bit longer than 1 Earth year, and the orbit is on 2/3 eccentricity, but where only the "2" part is inside the Goldilocks zone.

In winter everything freezes over, at about -200ºC surface temperature.

Could animal and plant life sustain this period by implementing something similar to existing hibernation/dormancy?

Could humans survive in the environment given stasis chambers?

This question is inspired by the first short story in The Eisenhorn Trilogy, I will look up the name later.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/10434. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

The eccentricity of an orbit is defined as $$e=\frac{r_a-r_p}{r_a+r_p}$$ where $r_a$ and $r_p$ are the distances to the farthest and closest points of the planet's orbit from the star. If $e=2/3$, then $r_a=5r_p$, which is quite significant. It seems that the planet will not remain in the habitable zone for its entire orbit.

However, it turns out that it doesn't have to. The flux on a planet's surface scales like $$F\propto a^{-2}(1-e^2)^{-1/2}$$ where $a$ is the semi-major axis, with $a=(r_a+r_p)/2=3r_p$. Given that $e=2/3$, the eccentricity factor is only $$(1-(2/3)^2)^{-1/2}=(5/9)^{-1/2}\approx1.34$$ which actually isn't that much. In other words, the mean flux is not substantially different from the flux incident on a planet orbiting at $3r_p$ with $e=0$.

In winter everything freezes over, at about -200ºC surface temperature.

The effective temperature at a distance $r$ from the star is proportional to $r^{-1/2}$. Therefore, at $r=r_a=5r_p$, $T(r_a)\approx0.45T(r_p)$. At $r=a=3r_p$, $T(a)\approx0.58T(r_p)$. In other words, ignoring things like thermal inertia and atmospheric currents, the temperature at aphelion should not be substantially different from the temperature of the planet in the habitable zone. So even if we ignore thermal inertia, such dramatic temperature swings seem a little unlikely.

Could animal and plan life sustain this period by implementing something similar to existing hibernation/dormancy?

We did see that at the closest approach, temperatures will be significantly higher than at the habitable zone, and as planets move quicker when they're closer to the star, it seems likely that there will indeed be hibernation of some sort - just when it's hot. They'll need to either hibernate for much of a year or else just adapt to the conditions. But the environment there is pretty hostile to life. For the other half of the orbit, though, things seem more conducive to life.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »