Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Would a clone army be a viable means of reproduction?

+0
−0

I have been reading on Wikipedia about cloning and am considering it a possibility for reproduction in my world. I am finding it slightly difficult to find all of the cons and pros associated with it. I have these:

  • Pros

    • Faster reproduction is theoretically possible
    • Get one good "template that has not inherited any genetic diseases and you effectively cure these diseases in a few generations
  • Cons

    • easily susceptible to corruption-choose the wrong template and everyone born has a specific defect of the template
    • Moral and ethical reasons (nonexistent in my world but still thought to list it)

This list feels relatively complete but I want my world to be screaming detail and it feels like I am missing something important.

My question is this:
What are the main, scientifically-backed reasons cloning is or is not an efficient method of reproduction for complex life?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/10085. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »