Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Creating a species with birdlike bone structure

+0
−0

I'm working on creating a race of humanoids with "hollow" bones like birds (they have criss-crossing struts for internal support). They are short - an individual is unlikely to top five feet.

Would this species be significantly more prone to injury than regular humans? Could they still participate in athletic activities?

Also, would this bone structure have an effect upon their culture?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/8499. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

From what I've found, they'd be less prone to injury.

Bird bones are hollow and therefore lighter than solid bones of the same size, which is a boon to flying. However, they're also extremely dense. This does add weight - quite a lot, it fact - but it makes the bones incredibly strong, stronger than the bones of most similarly-sized creatures. It also means that the bones are really stiff, which is another good thing.

The fact that they're short shouldn't matter too much, because, as it turns out, bones of smaller creatures aren't any weaker than those of larger creatures. This study determined that

No significant difference (P > 0-2) was found in the failure stress of bone over a range in size from 0-05-700 kg (233 + 53 MN/m1 for small animals compared to 200 ± 28 MN/m2 for large animals).

That's a huge size range! So these people are going to have skeletons just as strong as normal humans - if not stronger. You could argue that stiffness could lead to bones being more brittle, but I think the increased bone density could help with that.

The cultural aspect is a bit tougher. You could argue that the strength increase would increase and warlike or violent tendencies in the species, though that might be a weak argument. I don't think it would give the beings any advantages, though, because the decreased height would mean that they would weigh less that normal humans, assuming an equal body density.

I suppose it depends on just what caused them to have to bone density they have. Could their ancestors have be avian? Are they avian? In that case, we enter the realm of bird culture. In early bird-like civilizations, the sky might be revered, and the sky god(s) could hold more sway in mythology than the sun god(s). The ground might be feared, or associated with the afterlife, as the ancient Greeks and Romans associated the underground with death and the afterlife.


References:

"Bone Strength in Small Mammals and Bipedal Birds: Do Safety Factors Change with Body Size?" by Andrew A. Biewener

Science Daily

Ask Nature

Wikipedia

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »