Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

How big should a terrarium be to be self-sustained?

+0
−0

I read some time ago about terraria (singular: terrarium), which are basically small ecosystems of plants, isolated from the outside world (they get just energy from outside, not water or oxygen). The question is how big should such a terrarium be to support a human, assuming it has an infinite energy source and today's technology?

Given the technology available, it is possible to create an artificial environment, where the temperature and humidity is controlled. I believe even the composition of the air can be controlled to some extent, by having some air separation plants and adding some gases to increase their concentration. Also, the water is not a problem, as there are artificial environments where water is recycled (like the International Space Station).

So 2 problems remain: oxygen and food. I think the main source of food should be plants. A nice side-effect of growing plants is that they generate oxygen. Actually, if they produce enough food, they produce enough oxygen. But what kind of plants and how much plants should be harvested in order to produce enough food and oxygen for a man?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/7155. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

Problem 1: Food

This is the major contributing factor to the size of the biosphere. Humans need to consume around 2,250 calories per day (averaged between men and women) to sustain themselves, and more if they are doing physical work. 2,250 cal = 10,460 joules (or 10.46kJ), but that's not very useful. More useful: 100g of potato (in any form) = 77cal. One medium potato (defined by Google via USDA as 213g) contains 163 calories. If you live off potatoes alone, you'll need:

$$ 2,250 \div 163 = 13.80 \approx 14\text{ potatoes/day} $$ $$ = 14 \times 365 = 5110 \text{ potatoes/year} $$

That's quite a lot of potatoes. As you can see here, potatoes can be planted March-May and harvested Jun-Oct. You could always plant several crops to be harvested at different times.

The same website as linked above says potatoes should be planted around 30cm apart. Assuming you follow this guide, then you'll need:

$$ 5110 \times 30 = 153300\text{cm} = 1533.00\text{m} $$

for all your potatoes in one row. However, you could plant in multiple rows to save space:

$$ 1533 \div 50 = 30.66 \text{m length} $$ $$ 50 \times 0.3\text{m} = 15\text{m width} $$ $$ 30.66 \times 15 = 459.9\text{m}^{2} $$

So, to survive on potatoes for one year, you will need 460 square metres of space in the biosphere. However, take into account that

  • You won't want to survive on potatoes for a year, so you need more land for other foods;
  • If you do just stick with potatoes, you can't plant them in the same place in consecutive years, so double the land required (920 square metres)
  • Potatoes may not be the best plant. That said, at some quick calculations, carrots would require around 140 square metres less land for the same crop. However, carrots have less calorific content per unit (41 per medium carrot), so you would need more. Growing wheat, while more space efficient, requires work after it's harvested an other ingredients to bring it to an edible state.

Problem 2: Oxygen

I see two options. You can either filter outside air or grow lots of plants.
Filter outside air
If you're assuming today's tech, you need some costly and space-inefficient filtering units. If you have advanced tech, then the walls of your biosphere can be filters, but I'll stick to today's tech. This site has a very good explanation of the oxygen requirements of an average human. To summarise:

8.3ft2 of air per adult for 5 hours (with an 8ft ceiling)

However, this is a bare minimum. If the size is much less, you won't last 5 hours. The FEMA recommendation is 10ft2 per adult for 5 hours. Given that air is 21% oxygen, this comes to $8.3 \times 0.21 = 1.74$ square feet for 5 hours. Using more appropriate numbers, this is $1.74 \times 8 = 13.92$ cubic feet for 5 hours, and $13.92 \div 5 = 2.78$ cubic feet per hour. That sounds like a fairly reasonable number: what output would you need?

$$ (2.78 \div 21) \times 100 = 13.23 $$

This line shows that 2.78 cubic feet per hour of oxygen equates to 13.23 cubic feet per hour of normal air.

$$ (13.23 \div 60) \div 60 = 0.003675 $$

This is the amount of air that your concentrator needs to take in per second to keep you alive. That's a perfectly good number: given that many home fans can move around 2 cubic feet of air per second, a commercial fan in a concentrator will have no trouble. A unit capable of doing this takes up less than 1 square metre.

Grow lots of plants
According to NASA, the average human needs 0.84kg of oxygen each day to survive. This can be produced by any size plants, but the space requirement changes depending. For example, a mature broadleaf tree such as an oak produces 10-15kg of oxygen per day, plenty to support a human. However, it can easily take up 20 square metres of space and can reach up to 30m high. Smaller plants may be easier: since they produce less oxygen, you can use a more exact number to produce closer to the right amount of oxygen per day, saving space. However, keep in mind that an exercising human uses much more oxygen - up to 7kg per day.

The really easy way is to just pull in air from outside. However, this may not be possible, so your best bet is probably the filter, as it takes up the least space.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »