Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Could a manned maneuvering unit provide artificial gravity?

+0
−0

Could a Manned Maneuvering Unit-type device provide a few hours of light artificial gravity* for a small person on an object with minimal gravity of its own? What sort of fuel would it need?

* Comparable to moon gravity or more.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/5270. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

Alert: Mathematics ahead.

Just being humorous. I know that not everyone likes math, so I figured I'd add that in. Just so I can say 'I told you!' if you complain about the math. In which case just read DonyorM's answer. Anyway . . .

The dimensions of the MMU are as follows:

  • 0.846 meters
  • 0.711 meters
  • 1.27 meters

The issue is, I don't know which of the first two is width and which is depth! Judging from picture, though, the MMU is wider than it is deep, so the depth appears to be 0.711 meters.

The other bit of information we need to know is the surface gravity of the Moon. The reason we don't want the mass of the Moon is because the astronaut is much closer to the center of mass of the MMU when s/he is strapped in than an astronaut on the Moon would be to the Moon's center of mass. To replicate the effects, we need to replicate the surface gravity.

  • gMoon=1.6249 m/s2

The formula for the force experienced on an person with a mass mp from a second body mb is F=mpg=Gmbmpr2 Cancelling out the mps leads us to g=Gmbr2 We have g, G, and r. Let's find mb: mb=gr2G Plugging in our values, we get mb=1.6249×(0.711)26.673×1011=1.23096219×1010 kilograms The volume (V) of the MMU is V=0.846×0.711×1.27=0.76391262 meters3 Density (ρ) is MV, so we have ρ=MV=1.23096219×10100.76391262=1.611391353×1010 kilograms/meter3 That's roughly 10 times as dense as a white dwarf. Not doable by humans.


As DonyorM discussed, the best choice for your question (because you asked about a human-made source) would be to spin the MMU. And what do you know - more math!

The centripetal force on an astronaut must be the same as the surface gravity of the moon: Fc=mvc2r=mgMoon Once again, the ms cancel out, and we re-arrange to get vc=gMoonr Here, r=0.711 meters, so vc=1.074850641 meters/second The angular velocity ω is vcr: ω=vcr=1.511744924 radians/second Treating the entire apparatus as a block with the dimensions of the MMU (okay, I'll add half a meter to the height to account for the astronaut's legs sticking out, and the MMU has a mass of 148 kilograms, and the astronaut has a mass of, say 75 kilograms), we have the moment of inertia I as I=112m(w2+d2)=112(75+148)(.8462+.7112)=22.69465425 Angular momentum L is defined as L=Iω=22.69465425×1.511744924=34.30852836 We know that we have to obey the law of conservation of momentum: dLsystemdt=0 which becomes d(112m(w2+d2)ω)dt=0 Everything here but m should, optimally, we a constant, because m changes as fuel is released. So something else has to change, too. Let's go back to the definition of ω: ω=vcr. So now we have d(112m(w2+d2)vcr)dt=0 Divding out a whole bunch of constants, we have d(mvcr)dt=0 This means that mvcr is a constant. We also know that F is a constant. This means that d(mvc2r)dt=0 So mvc2r is also a constant. Yet m changes. Could vc change? No, because in the first case, vc is raised to the first power, while in the second case, it is raised to the second power. In both cases, it would have to match dm . . . and if dv0, then this would be impossible in both cases. So r must change, and so dmdt=drdt Whether or not this is possible for humans to engineer depends on how easily the radius is changed (impossible on the MMU!), and how quickly the mass changes (e.g. how much propellant is expelled in a given time.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »