Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Restricted Directions for an Alcubierre Drive?

Parent

Restricted Directions for an Alcubierre Drive?

+4
−0

It's my understanding that if an Alcubierre drive were to be constructed, it would be able to function as a time machine because there would be certain paths through you could take to get to a destination which would result in you arriving before you started. It is, however, also my understanding that this isn't a necessity of the concept, merely a way that it can be used.

Assume that an Alcubierre drive has been invented, but that there is some intrinsic property of the process that makes it impossible for a ship to arrive before or at the moment that it left. Turning the ship onto a course which enables it to arrive before its actual speed should theoretically allow it to (e.g. a ship that can travel 10x the speed of light arriving ten light-years away in less than a year) starts to destabilize the 'warp field', making it harder and harder to maintain; and turning the ship onto a course which takes it back in time instantly collapses the 'warp field', with no way to maintain it.

I still don't have an intuitive grasp on how FTL travel in this fashion generates time travel, so I don't know if this setup makes any physical sense. Assuming that it does, how would this restrict which directions a ship could travel in, and when?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/177526. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

0 comment threads

Post
+2
−0

Yes. By restricting the directions it can travel in, you can create an Alcubierre drive that can't be used as a time machine to create paradoxes.

The simplest way to do this is to pick a single frame of reference for the warp drive. The Alcubierre drive must never go back in time /according to this reference frame/. There are no other restrictions. It's hard to explain further without turning this answer into a primer on special relativity and Minkowski spacetime.

Relativity, Causality, FTL ← Pick 2

"Relativity" is the idea that the laws of physics are the same for every reference frame. An Alcubierre drive with a preferred reference frame would therefore violate the abstract idea of "relativity". But Newtonian relativity, special relativity and general relativity would all be preserved.

In other words, you get to have 2 of the following 3 things.

  • Relativity (background independence)
  • FTL (faster-than-light travel)
  • Causality (world without time travel)

Our universe has relativity and causality. If you want a causal world with FTL then you have to throw out relativity, but just for the Alcubierre drive itself. The rest of the universe would still work the way we're used to.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

I'm sorry to resurrect this question, but does this mean that you would make two one-way wormholes ne... (1 comment)
I'm sorry to resurrect this question, but does this mean that you would make two one-way wormholes ne...
Bianca_Railway‭ wrote over 1 year ago

I'm sorry to resurrect this question, but does this mean that you would make two one-way wormholes next to each other, rather than a single two-way wormhole?

This is very helpful for me if true! I've been struggling to work out how wormholes can work without allowing time travel

(an interesting issue I saw: if a wormhole were to be placed on a infinitely fast spacecraft, and that spacecraft were to fly somewhere at near-light speed and fly back, you could see through the wormhole that the craft had landed already but if you looked at where it landed you'd see an empty landing pad)