Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Rigorous Science

Comments on Producing hydrocarbons by electrolysis

Post

Producing hydrocarbons by electrolysis

+1
−1

When water is electrolysed with graphite electrodes some of the oxygen reacts immediately with the anode to produce carbon dioxide. Does a similar reaction ever occur at the cathode, producing methane instead of hydrogen? If such a reaction takes place at all then Le Chatelier's principle suggests that increasing the pressure should increase the yield of hydrocarbon.

Since methane is a more easily managed fuel than hydrogen I would expect that there would be practical applications for such a process, so does the chemistry not work, or are there other reasons why it is not useful.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Rigorous science? (3 comments)
Rigorous science?
Monica Cellio‭ wrote about 2 years ago

Hello. You've posted a few questions in the Rigorous Science category, and I wonder if you meant to post them in Q&A instead? Rigorous Science is intended for questions that have already had some research behind them -- think science journals rather than more casual settings. See these category guidelines (also linked from the category description/summary at the top of the posts list).

chris-barry‭ wrote about 2 years ago

No, I definitely meant to post them in Rigorous Science. Whether that is the most appropriate place is another matter. I would like the answers to be based on rigorous science. Where appropriate I would like to see equations and citations. My questions fail because the research I have done ranges from cursory to none at all.

There is a simple reason for this. Although the subjects interest me they are of no practical importance. If I needed to I could probably answer the questions for myself. It might well involve several days work and at the end of it there would be no reason for me to ask anything here.

Instead I ask a question here in the hope that it might be read by someone familiar with the subject who is able to answer the question in a short time from her own knowledge, and that furthermore the answers may interest other people.

Monica Cellio‭ wrote about 2 years ago

Thanks for your reply. I hope you get the answers you're looking for. (I'm not equipped to help, sorry.)