Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Comments on How can we grow this community?

Parent

How can we grow this community?

+3
−0

Codidact's communities have a lot of great content that is helping people on the Internet. Our communities are small, though, and sustainable communities depend on having lots of active, engaged participants. The folks already here are doing good work; our challenge is to find more people like you so we can help this community grow.

This calls for a two-pronged approach: reaching more people who would be interested if only they knew about us, and making sure that visitors get a good first impression. I'm here to ask for your help with both.

Reaching more people

The pool of people interested in scientific exploration and science-bounded imagination is large, from authors to game designers to folks who are insatiably curious about future possibilities. My question to you is: where do we find those people? You're the experts on this topic, not us. Where would it be most fruitful to promote Codidact? How should we appeal to them to draw them in?

Please don't give general answers like "science fiction clubs". We need your expert input to decide where, specifically, we should be looking. We are now able to pay for some advertising -- where should we direct it, and what message would best reach that audience? Can you help us sell your community?

Finally, some types of promotion are best done peer to peer. You are the experts in your topic; messages from you on subreddits or professional forums or the like will be much more credible than messages from Codidact staff. For these types of settings, we need your help to get the word out. If you know of a suitable place and can volunteer to spread the word there, please leave an answer about it so we all know about it (and know not to also post there).

Making a good first impression

Pretend for a moment that you don't know anything about Codidact. Visit this community in incognito mode. What's your reaction? If it's negative, what can we do about it? Some known deterrents from across the network:

  • Latest activity is not recent. This tells people the community isn't active. Anecdotally, we have lots of people ready to answer good questions, and on some communities, not enough good questions for them to answer. Can you help with that?

  • Latest questions are unanswered. This tells people it might not be worth asking here. Why are our unanswered questions unanswered? Are they poor questions in some regard? Unclear, too basic, too esoteric, just not interesting? Can they be fixed? Should they be hidden?[1]

  • Latest questions have poor scores. This tells people that either there's lots of low-quality material here or the voters are overly picky. If it's a quality problem, same questions as the previous bullet. If good content is getting downvoted, or not getting upvoted, can you help us understand why?

These are issues we've seen or heard about from across the network, but each community is different. What do you see here? What might be turning people away, and what could we do about it?

Are there things about the platform itself, as opposed to content, that discourage people we're trying to attract? If there's something we can customize to better serve this community, please let us know. If there are other changes in presentation or behavior that you think would encourage visitors to stick around, what are they?

Conversely, what is this community doing well? What draws newcomers in? I don't just mean the reverse of those bullets. What do we need to keep doing, and what might be worth highlighting when promoting this community?


  1. Should the question list not show some questions to anonymous visitors? What should the criteria be? ↩︎

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+2
−0

Under "Making a Good First Impression", a few mechanical notes from someone just making the transition from WB.SE to Codidact -

  • Question titles should probably be at the top of the page, instead of the bottom

  • Login from another community (for example writing.codidact.com) does not work - I must login from a community that I am already a part of (such as scientific-speculation.codidact.com). I suspect when I subscribe to writing.codidact.com that the problem will go away, but haven't tried it yet.

  • No help page (that I've found so far). Figured out that $$ La^T_Ex $$ markup requires two dollar signs, instead of one, from experience with TiddlyWiki. I'm not sure how someone else would figure it out.

  • Latex rendering is a little slow. I think this may be intentional that the preview is replaced with code as I type, and returns back to preview if a second passes without a keypress. But it IS different, and may be offputting to some people. Might be better as an option (and maybe it is; I haven't looked at settings yet).

  • Can't drop images in by URL.

  • It doesn't appear like there are any accepted answers. It's a bit hard to tell if debate is closed, or still open, on a particular question.

Positives

  • I like the copyright information on each post. It's nice to be crystal-clear what reuse restrictions are.

  • I like the "react" feature, although I haven't used it yet.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

3 comment threads

Thanks and some answers (4 comments)
MathJax (1 comment)
logins (3 comments)
Thanks and some answers
Monica Cellio‭ wrote over 2 years ago

Thank you for sharing your impressions as a new user! A couple comments/answers to points you raised:

The LaTeX help is in the formatting help. You didn't find it, though, so: any thoughts on where else we should link to that? If the row of formatting buttons included "?" to link to it, would that help?

LaTeX is slow. We're using libraries for that; not sure what we could speed up on our end. Sorry.

No accepted answers is by design. Questions are for everyone, not just the asker; if there's something new to add, we don't want to deter it. The "works for me" reaction is meant to mitigate.

We put the titles below the bodies when composing posts (only), because we've found that the rubber-ducking of actually writing the question often changes the eventual title. I know it's different. I'd be interested in your feedback after you've tried it a few more times. (Maybe we need to explain that reasoning on the post page?)

James McLellan‭ wrote over 2 years ago

In WB.SE, where editing a question, there is a "Helpful Links" window on the right. It contains a "Visit the Help Center" link. It's possible I'm not seeing a similar link when replying at Codidact. I see : "Featured", "Hot Posts", "Subscribe to Questions", "Codidact"... ah! I found it. It's in the menu bar all the way at the top. Might be helpful to have this menu bar stay on top (it scrolls off the page currently), or a duplicate "help" link with all of the other helpful windows on the right.

Ah, no problem on speed. It felt like it might have been an intentional feature (you can say it is)!

I see what you're saying about both subject lines and accepted answers. Like you said, I'll have to try it a few more times.

Monica Cellio‭ wrote over 2 years ago

Oh, editing help! Yes, I agree. Right now the contents of the right column are fixed (you see the same stuff when reading or editing), but I'd like to instead place some editing guidance there when in the editor.

James McLellan‭ wrote almost 2 years ago

Monica Cellio‭ I have another question : I may have misunderstood your response that there are no accepted answers by design to mean we want to foster discussions, not be narrowly "one question, one answer". With that in mind, I started a discussion https://scientific-speculation.codidact.com/posts/287351 that was closed for asking two questions instead of one. Should it be one question at a time, but an open-ended discussion around that single question?