Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Rigorous Science

Comments on What would one experience travelling through an invisible Krasnikov tube, and how much could they be used to cut travel times?

Parent

What would one experience travelling through an invisible Krasnikov tube, and how much could they be used to cut travel times?

+2
−0

Effectively what the title says; What would different observers experience while travelling through / seeing one travel through the tube, and how could they be used to cut travel times? (Just answering one of these questions is ok)

Within my world, I have no "proper" (causality violating) FTL travel; only Wormholes, subluminal warp drives and Krasnikov Tubes. I had the idea that a very large line-layer ship with 2 wormhole mouths could travel to a system, lets say 10 light years away. The ship could then break in twine and send one of the wormhole mouths back through the tube while expanding the other on site. The wormhole mouth sent back would appear after I had originally left, as far as I'm aware, the ship-time it took me to get there. So assuming I was moving at highly relativistic speeds so that the 10ly journey was 1 year, the wormhole mouth would arrive at Earth 1 year after I had left, effectively acting as if my linelayer ship could travel at 10c, and massively increasing the amount of systems I can colonise within a certain timespan. I just wanted to know if this could really work without causing causality issues? (CTC's destroy causality violating space-times in my universe)

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/173460. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

0 comment threads

Post
+0
−2

What would one experience travelling through an invisible Krasnikov tube?

A flat piece of paper doesn't quite lie flat, and the walls on your ship are under considerable stress (unless the ship's built to handle being in non-Euclidean geometries). Apart from that, not much; it's just spacetime, albeit a slightly oddly shaped bit of it. (If the tube's too small, your bones might crack, but I'm assuming it's not that small.) This distortion effect would occur more towards the ends of the tube and less in the middle, I think.

Travelling "through" the tube is a bit of a misnomer. You'd travel along the 3-surface of the tube. If you looked sort of sideways of the opening, you'd see light that had "looped round" the tube before reaching your eyes, a little like the effect you get when you put two long parallel mirrors next to each other (but with more dimensions). You'd also be able to see your own ship in the distance if you looked exactly perpendicular to your direction of travel. (This isn't much different to other kinds of wormhole, except perhaps for the length.)

I'm not sure what would happen if you tried to take a wormhole through another wormhole; my poorly-calibrated intuition says it'd be okay if you were taking a small wormhole through a really big wormhole, but moving a wormhole to the mouth of one not much bigger might make one or both of them violently collapse. Make sure to run the numbers before you actually try to do this.

I just wanted to know if this could really work without causing causality issues?

Without assuming the chronology protection conjecture? No. FTL travel necessarily implies closed time-like curves, unless closed time-like curves happen to be impossible due to some as-yet-unknown implication of the True and Complete Laws of the Universe.

Here's an example construction of a time machine:

  • Go from point A to point B really fast, leaving a Krasnikov tube behind you.
  • Go from point B to point A really fast, leaving a second Krasnikov tube behind you.

You're now in the far future of point A… but go back through the tubes, and you're back at A, not too far in the future from when you started. Future people can now travel into the past. Oops.

Unlike Alcubierre drives, Krasnikov tubes don't let you travel back in time to before your time machine was created. However, there's still time travel.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (2 comments)
General comments
wizzwizz4‭ wrote over 4 years ago · edited over 4 years ago

This answer is poorly researched and fairly vague, but I'm pretty sure none of it's incorrect (apart from the speculation about moving wormholes through each other, which almost certainly is).

HDE 226868‭ wrote over 4 years ago

I think this kinda falls short of what we're hoping for in Rigorous Science answers - we're still ironing out some kinks, but that's our working version of the requirements at the moment.