Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Could a habitable planet lit by the cosmic microwave background plausibly exist?

Parent

Could a habitable planet lit by the cosmic microwave background plausibly exist?

+6
−0

I've got this idea of a rogue planet that is moving that fast through the intergalactic void that the cosmic microwave radiation, thanks to the Doppler effect, actually provides enough heat that it is habitable (and of course, it should be actually inhabited). Thanks to the searchlight effect, I think the incoming radiation should even look roughly star-like, though I haven't done any actual calculation on this.

However I wonder how plausible such a planet would be. In particular,

  • Is there any plausible (though possibly very unlikely) way such a planet could come into existence?

  • Is it plausible for that planet to exist long enough in this state to develop life? After all, eventually it will have to interact with something else (though I aimed at minimising that by having it pass through an intergalactic void).

  • I'd actually also like to have a moon orbiting that planet. Is it plausible for such a planet to have obtained one?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+4
−0

A back of the envelope calculation suggests that you need a velocity relative to the CMBR of more than 0.9c. (1mm microwaves blue-shifted to 570nm light typical of yellow dwarves)

This is a problem for several reasons:

  • there is no known mechanism to create a planet with that velocity relative to anything

  • there is no reasonable mechanism to accelerate a planet to that velocity

  • interstellar dust particles, averaging 1 per million cubic meters in the vicinity of Sol, will strike the planet at 0.9c. It's going to be scoured clean in a few decades

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (2 comments)
General comments
celtschk‭ wrote over 3 years ago

Since I was talking about a planet in the void, I don't see the relevance of the particle density near sol (which isn't even intergalactic space, let alone a void). The other points are clearly relevant, though; +1.

Olin Lathrop‭ wrote over 3 years ago

This still leaves open what the intensity of the resulting radiation is. If even after shifting the CMB to 570 nm you only get a few Watts per square meter, you still don't have anything remotely like Earth.