Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Centripetal Burn in Orbit

Post

Centripetal Burn in Orbit

+6
−0

Imagine a spacecraft in a highly eccentric orbit. Say the craft burns at periapsis towards the planet such that its orbital eccentricity does not change and the craft's periapsis moves with the ship so the two stay at the same point at all times. This would result in a circular orbit, but a faster orbit than would normally occur at such an attitude.

Aside from this being horribly wasteful and generally impractical:

My first question is whether this maneuver has a name. I would guess not because it's an extremely wasteful maneuver in most cases, and wouldn't be worth any benefit you could get by performing it.

One possible use case, however improbable the scenario, would be to accelerate an orbit. Imagine a spacecraft in low-earth orbit moving at 7.5km/s. If the craft were to burn prograde until it were moving at 15km/s (doubling its velocity) and then continuously burn towards the planet as I described, it could effectively halve its orbital period by doubling the centripetal force keeping the craft in orbit (half of the acceleration is due to gravity, half due to the constant burn).

Is there a more efficient way than this to accelerate your orbit beyond the orbital rate that can be achieved just above the Carmen line (assuming we don't want to drop below the line)?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (3 comments)
General comments

Skipping 3 deleted comments.

Josh Hyatt‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

@Mr Bumble OP updated.

Peter Taylor‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

The scenario seems self-contradictory to me: if the spacecraft is in a highly eccentric orbit and burns "such that its orbital eccentricity does not change", how does it end up in a circular orbit?

Josh Hyatt‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

@Peter Taylor The craft is at periapsis in a highly eccentric burn. If it continues along its path, it will certainly move away from the planet. If, however, it burns directly towards the planet at the right acceleration, the periapsis will move with the spacecraft, but the eccentricity will stay the same. That is to say, the altitude at apoapsis and periapsis will remain constant, but the periapsis will "orbit" the planet at the same rate as the craft.