Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on How do you establish identity when people can change their appearance at will?

Parent

How do you establish identity when people can change their appearance at will?

+6
−0

Building on the universe established in this question, what happens to identity verification when someone's physical appearance and genetic code are modifiable at any time?

Review of universe rules:

  • All genetic disorders have been eliminated. Children are tested at birth for disorders and those disorders are eliminated. Eugenics doesn't play a role here as every outward attribute is maleable.
  • Genetic manipulation is cheap, ubiquitous, and perfect (no side-effects or unintentional changes).
  • Genomes are cheap to sequence ($10/genome).
  • Gene treatments are capable of manipulating every single characteristics of a person's body, including but not limited to, hair color, eye color, skin color, facial structure, body fat distribution, height, musculature, sex.
  • Near-future (max 2025) technology levels. (Admittedly, genetic manipulation of this kind is probably not going to be available in the next 10 years, but just go with it.)
  • Genetic manipulations are highly regulated with perfect enforcement of regulations by a global regulatory body. This doesn't preclude people from making illegal genetic changes, just the assurance that they will be caught and the changes reverted.
  • Manipulation of the brain or brain chemistry is strictly prohibited. (Sorry, schizophrenics, your time will come.)

Additional rules:

  • While the treatments are very monetarily cheap for all possible manipulations, the changes themselves can be painful and lengthy. For example, adding two inches to your height would require time off your feet and some painkillers as your bones, tendons and muscles reform themselves to the new genetic blueprint.
  • Genetic privacy is tightly regulated with long court histories protecting a person's genome; think European privacy laws only with stronger penalties and tighter enforcement.

To establish a user's identity, three different components may be used, something the user has (such as a credit card), something the user knows (PIN to a credit card) or something permanently attached to the user (fingerprints or facial recognition). Strong authentication or two factor authentication relies on having two of the three identification components.

With this new gene manipulation technology, biometric authentication no longer works the way it did. Looking at someone's picture on a drivers license or taking fingerprints no longer unequivocally establishes someone's identity.

What kind of technological and/or regulatory solution(s) might be used to ensure that a person's identity can be verified with 99.99999% accuracy? (At this degree of accuracy, a misidentification will occur once in every million identification attempts) Broader changes to society as a result of amorphous physical identities are outside the scope of this question.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

Have a genetic sequence coding for a hash in a block chain of citizen identities. You are given a un... (1 comment)
General comments (2 comments)
Post
+2
−0

One obvious answer is RFID tag microchip implants, for example attached to the ear at birth, at the same time as someone is given their personal credentials. The body can change but the chip will remain the same. This technology is already available today, used on pets and livestock etc.

There are of course many practical problems with this: is the encryption safe enough, data retention, will the tag need to be repeatedly replaced, what if someone cuts off their ear etc.

In addition to this tag, perhaps the "personal credential numbers" (social security number or whatever it is called in the specific nation) are only known to the person and the authorities, not the public.

To authenticate someone's identity, you could ask for the person's name, number, date of birth and the RFID chip itself.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (3 comments)
General comments
Pastychomper‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

Years ago I was told there was a problem with rfid chips used in racehorses because it was easy to remove a chip from one horse and hide it in the mane of another to let the second horse temporarily impersonate (imequinate?) the first. It might be worth looking to that industry for pointers if you go that route.

Lundin‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

@Pastychomper‭ Yeah so some other means of credentials must be used in parallel, there are many problems with this technique. But lets face it, what we consider secure every day is not. We still rely on things like photos and signatures to this date, which are very easy to forge. It's just the illusion of safety that makes them actually somewhat safe. Web sites and software even rely on mouse clicks as a way to establish someone's identity - "you clicked that you agreed on the ToS".

Pastychomper‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

Good points. I don't think the problems I described stopped them being used for horses, either.