Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Rigorous Science

Explaining a Low-Mass Brown Dwarf

+0
−0

Considering the well-established relationships between stellar mass, surface temp, and luminosity, how unusual would it be to find a star (or brown dwarf) that possesses about half the mass of an average member of its spectral category?

Follow-up questions: If such an anomaly did exist, what sort of phenomena could be responsible? Would it be relatively stable over a human lifespan? Or would it necessarily be a transient phenomenon like most variable stars?

The specific example in question is a brown dwarf with a mass ~7110 times Earth, radius ~12 times Earth's, and a spectral black-body temp of 1400K (placing it in the L8 to L9 spectral class). For a sci-fi story, I've constructed a setting with this brown dwarf, Kabina, in orbit of the star Phi2 Ceti (renamed Bahram in everyday parlance), and multiple colonized planets orbiting both the primary star and the brown dwarf.

On reviewing my notes recently and double-checking the numbers, I realized that late L-class brown dwarfs tend to have a mass 1.5 to 3 times the figure I was working with. Whereas brown dwarfs of similar mass are liable to be less than half as hot and bright.

I've calculated the orbits and surface temps of the orbiting planets based on these numbers, so if I need to fix the properties of my brown dwarf, I need to also rework the planetary orbits in order to maintain habitability. If, on the other hand, I can find a plausible explanation for the anomaly, it becomes a cool little detail of the system to add scientific curiosity, and I don't have to rewrite the calendars I've already drawn up for the colonies in orbit.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/132539. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

7110 Earth masses and a surface temperature of 1700 K aren't unreasonable for a brown dwarf. The lower mass limit is thought to be around 13 Jupiter masses (or 4100 Earth masses) (see e.g. Spiegel et al. 2010), and we see temperatures as low as 500 K in certain Y-class brown dwarfs. 12 Earth radii also seems fairly realistic, especially for your choice of mass. You've made fairly consistent choices in your parameters

We expect a brown dwarf - or a planet, or an M star - to cool over time, eventually reaching fairly low temperatures. A graph from Burrows et al. 1997, taken from these slides), should emphasize that point:

Graph of brown dwarf temperature evolution
See also Burrows et al. 1997.

A brown dwarf of 7110 Earth masses (just over 22 Jupiter masses) should reach the temperature you desire in about a billion years or so.

Here are examples of brown dwarfs with similar properties:

The latter two are actually pretty similar to yours, in terms of mass and temperature.

If there was a brown dwarf of, say, 10 Jupiter masses, well, it might instead be classified as a rogue planet or sub-brown dwarf, rather than a brown dwarf. Cha 110913-773444 is an object like this (Luhman et al. 2005). We don't know how these bodies form; it's possible that the low mass is simply due to a dearth of material around the body early in its life.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »